🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the Britain, and it feels like it’s time for a re-evaluation. Throughout its history, an observance that started out as a commemorative event of history, culture and the connections between global Black communities, has developed a corporate feel, broadening to incorporate functions where individuals of African heritage are remunerated to address Caucasian groups about hidden biases and supportive partnership. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade sparked an increase in the industry of demonstrating racial awareness. However, that period has concluded. The tide has peaked, producing a diluted aftermath of what raising awareness is for.

The Origins of Black History Month

First commemorated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with a week of celebration and reflection in the second week of February. Black History Month developed from this movement and was publicly established in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the US and Canada in February, but also in October in the Britain, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The observance has evolved since that time, giving reduced attention to the narratives of transatlantic enslavement and struggles for equality, and increasingly on influential individuals of color in politics, culture, and activism, and extensively acknowledging the input Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in schools where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with talks and cultural events. But the way the celebration is observed is a indication of the current political situation. How it progresses is a good lesson in how appropriation leads to dismantling: the transformation of Black History Month has hindered the point of it, which is to confront structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Hardly anything shows how important it is to rethink Black History Month as much as the particular moment in which it occurs this year. In the United Kingdom, a revitalized conservative movement in the guise of the Reform party is ahead in surveys. In the summer we witnessed the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in the UK's past. a prominent political figure, the Black leader of the Tory party, is a firm opponent of anti-racism activism, and we are in a position where a elected representative feels empowered to say that a lack of white people in specific city neighborhoods is a cause for alarm. At the same time, ultra-nationalist movements are growing in Europe as a complete entity.

In the United States, a massive attack against DEI and affirmative action has been taken, frequently with success, to the top legal institutions of the country. A campaign to scrub African American heritage and experience from the historical documents is ongoing. One of the political figure's first executive orders targeted the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the Smithsonian Institution, claiming they of a organized and extensive campaign to change the national past” by depicting the United States “as naturally discriminatory”.

Against this backdrop, the observance represents how little it can be effective if it is limited to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or politically neutered celebrations of contributions in the past, rather than confronting the conditions of the contemporary world. It also reveals how its limited duration means that it is separated from the wider consistent effort that is necessary. An academic expert, a educator at University of Greenwich, put it best when she raised concerns about the short-term symbolic gestures of the celebration. “The issue with embracing a superficial method”, she wrote, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month becomes a brief show rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Figuring out how to alter, change and broaden efforts for equal rights and acknowledgment in such times of discouragement and concern is a treacherous thing. There is a urge to just discontinue events including Black History Month entirely, thinking they are no longer suitable, or are relics of an period that has not worked.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and heritage of campaigns for equality – local anti-racism groups, inclusion and equity efforts, and yes, even those talks to businesses – represent an framework that a considerable labor has been dedicated to. It is there not just to decay as the politics moves on (and in fact, regresses), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month appear as? Firstly, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is spread out across all seasons (as certain organizations are already starting to implement), parts of its content (particularly around prominent figures of color) integrated into school curriculums. It would also be a period that does not avoid politics, and allows opportunity for citizens, particularly young people, to share their anxieties and narratives. What purpose serves basic knowledge of the past when it fails to address the contemporary truth of far-right rallies in the urban areas? Institutions who mark it should not be pacified with the passive language of hidden discrimination and sensitivity to “microaggressions”, but challenged by the dangers that affect everyone if fight against prejudice is not approached earnestly. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, urgent, and adaptive. Perhaps an total re-identification is in order – Black History is Now Month.