🔗 Share this article

Russia's monetary authority has announced it is seeking compensation totaling $230 billion from the securities depository Euroclear. This legal step is a direct response by the Kremlin against plans to utilize frozen Russian sovereign funds to aid Ukraine.

The Substantial Demand

Based on accounts in Russian state media, the central bank filed a lawsuit last week for approximately 18 trillion roubles. This figure corresponds to the stated $230 billion claim.

European Union officials will decide in the coming days regarding a plan to use approximately €210 billion in immobilized Russian assets. The proposal entails providing Ukraine with a large loan to finance its defence and economic stability.

The vast majority of these assets, totaling €185 billion, reside at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. This institution acts as the primary keeper for the Russian immobilised financial reserves.

Dispute on Ownership

EU officials have argued that their plan is on solid legal ground. Their position rests on the fact that ownership of the sovereign wealth still belongs to Russia, even though it was frozen in EU countries shortly after the 2022 military offensive of Ukraine.

The Russian government, in contrast, has called any utilization of the assets as theft. Authorities have threatened reciprocal actions, such as seizing European corporate holdings within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, who has assumed a key role in diplomatic talks, wrote on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and regain its assets. He warned that the European Union, the common currency, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the proposal.

Strategic Positioning

In comments interpreted as an effort to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, the official described the proposal as "a vicious assault on the right to ownership and the international reserves system created by the United States."

Euroclear declined to provide a statement on the new lawsuit. It has in the past noted it is contending with more than 100 lawsuits in Russian courts.

Enforcement Challenges

Although judges in EU countries are not expected to enforce judgments from Russian courts, experts anticipate Moscow to pursue implementation in nations with closer ties to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities could try to enforce a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly states, provided that relevant assets can be located," stated a legal expert from an NSP law firm.

EU Countermeasures

European authorities indicated they are developing measures to discourage other countries from assisting any Russian legal action against European companies. Additionally, they are crafting safeguards to protect EU countries with assets in Russia from what they term "illegal expropriation."

The Proposed Loan Mechanism

According to the complex plan, the EU would provide an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, using the cash generated from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's legal claim on the principal funds would stay untouched.

Ukraine would solely be obligated to return the money if and when Russia agreed to pay compensation for the immense damage caused during the nearly four-year war.

Other Funding Ideas

Belgium, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to examine an different method for funding Ukraine. This involves common EU borrowing to fund a loan, backed by unallocated funds within the European budget.

Such a proposal, however, demands unanimity among all 27 EU countries. The Hungarian government, viewed as friendly with the Kremlin, has previously signaled its objection.

Commenting on Monday, the EU top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, described the reparations loan as "the strongest solution" for supporting Ukraine. "The reparations loan is secured against the Russian immobilized funds, meaning it is not drawn from our taxpayers' money, which is equally significant," she remarked. "Furthermore, it sends a clear signal that if you cause all this destruction to another country, you have to pay for the rebuilding."